I strongly oppose Bill 9. First of all, it is illegal. The 5th Amendment to the US constitution prohibits "Takings" which is exactly what this is. The Hawaiian Constitution Article 1, section 20 also prohibits "takings" but also "damages" to private property. The legal principle of estoppel also prohibits, in this case, Maui County, from taking away a previous lawful use that has been confirmed multiple times in Maui County ordinances and rulings. Second of all, if the 7000 Maui County property holders claim only $200,000 in damages, Maui County will have to pay $1.4 BILLION dollars in damages. If that number doesn't stop you in your tracks, it should. I suspect Maui County does not have that kind of money to pay out to condo owners. How much housing could Maui County build for $1.4 BILLION dollars.
I strongly suggest you take the emotion out of this equation and look only at the law. Both Kauai and Honolulu have tried what Maui County is proposing and the courts ruled against them. These are precedents that have already set up Bill 9 for failure. If the Council's attorneys are telling you that they have a way to work around these rulings, then I would reach out to new counsel for a second opinion.
Everyone deserves decent housing but forcing Bill 9 into the courts for who only knows how many years, is just kicking the can down the road. You need a better plan to provide affordable housing. You need to start building.
Regards, Ken Carpenter
I am a Maui resident and I oppose Bill 9
My condo was purchased in 2009 as my residence and was designated as Hotel/Condo. This was used as a STVR for times I visited family on the mainland, rented for less than 45 days a year. However, because I live and vote in Maui County, I won’t be turning it into a long term rental. I oppose Bill 9 because it was ill conceived, housing has been an issue before the Wildfire destroyed so many homes and this is not the answer. Maui County needs a better plan for subsidizing housing.
Use the property and TAT taxes to cover workforce housing costs. Build faster and better homes reserved for locals with tourism dollars. Thank you for considering this Maui resident’s testimony.
I strongly oppose Bill 9. I live and I have owned a rental on Maui since 1993, bought as part of my retirement portfolio. If Bill 9 is passed the income I rely on for my daily bread will vanish as will a great deal of revenue from tourism that go into the treasury. So good luck maintaining the programs that support the poorest in Maui and good luck with getting reelected, because you will have lost my vote and according to those I have spoken to a large number of others who live on Mau.
Subject: Strong Opposition to STR Phase-Out – A Devastating Path for Maui
Aloha Chair, Vice Chair, and Committee Members,
My name is Renee Lach, and my sister and I are proud owners of a short-term rental (STR) property in Maui County. A home we purchased from our parents, who lovingly maintained it for nearly 20 years. I’m writing to express my deep concern and strong opposition to the proposed
legislation that would phase out over 7,000 vacation rentals.
This proposal is not just about property, it’s about people. My family has always approached ownership in Maui with deep respect for the island and its community. There is truly no place on earth more beautiful, and we feel privileged to be stewards of a home here. We’ve hired a local
property manager who has been with us for over 15 years, along with her team of housekeepers, landscapers, and maintenance professionals, many of whom have become like family. In our welcome guide, we share personal recommendations that highlight local gems like
Duke’s, Bad Ass Coffee, and various island tours and activities. Our guests often tell us that these local touches helped them feel a deeper, more personal connection to Maui. One they simply wouldn’t have found in a hotel!
Many of our guests return year after year, including one tenant who has visited every January for 20 consecutive years, two sisters who began coming with their husbands, now return as widows to honor old memories and create new ones. This is the kind of connection that builds
lifelong loyalty to Maui and supports countless small businesses.
But here’s the truth: the majority of our guests tell us they would not come to Maui at all if shortterm rentals weren’t available. Hotels and timeshares don’t offer the space, flexibility, or affordability that families and long-term visitors need. STRs are not a threat to tourism, they are
part of its evolution. They support the very foundation of the visitor economy and contribute deeply to the character of the community.
The economic consequences of this legislation are staggering. According to research by the Travel Technology Association and Kloninger & Sims: If only Mayor Minatoya’s List of STRs are phased out, Maui County would lose:
• $53.3 to $91.8 million in RPT, TAT, and GET tax revenue
• $1.3 billion in economic output
• 7,800 local jobs
If all STRs are removed, the losses jump to:
• $128.3 to $280.9 million in tax revenue
• $2.2 billion in economic output
• 23,000 local jobs
These aren’t just numbers, they represent livelihoods, small businesses, and essential services. STR guests spent $2.2 billion in 2023 in Maui County alone. Across Hawai‘i, that figure reached $11.3 billion and supported 66,000 jobs. What is the County’s plan to replace this revenue and protect the local economy and jobs?
Owning in Maui is not without its challenges. We’ve weathered steep increases in insurance following the fires (nearly 40%), rising maintenance costs, and special assessments ($30,000 in 2024), all to preserve our property and keep it safe, welcoming, and functional. STR income
helps make this possible while keeping local service providers employed. This legislation feels rushed and punitive. Instead of shutting down an industry that has demonstrated both economic and community value, I urge the Council to collaborate with responsible owners to find balanced, enforceable solutions. We are not your adversaries, we want to be part of the answer.
Mahalo for your time and consideration. I respectfully ask you to vote against this legislation and work toward a future that honors the needs of residents, visitors, and Maui’s economy alike.
The local government could take head count on how many home owners would want to have a modular home on their property. All payment goes back to the county until it’s paid off and then property owner will take ownership of modular home, and then the county will still benefit from the taxes from rent on the modular home
Here’s a rewritten version of the testimony from the voice of a 32-year-old Native Hawaiian construction worker, written in plain, direct language. This version keeps the same powerful message but grounds it in lived experience, local identity, and frustration with entitlement and displacement.
⸻
🧾 Testimony from a Local Resident in Support of Bill 9
To: Maui County Council – Housing and Land Use Committee
From: Kainoa (Resident, 32, Native Hawaiian, Construction Worker)
Subject: Strong Support for Bill 9
Date: [Insert Date]
⸻
Aloha Councilmembers,
I work construction. My family is Hawaiian. We’ve been here for generations.
I’m writing to say I’m in strong support of Bill 9. It’s time.
⸻
We’ve Had Enough
I work hard. I help build homes here. But I can’t even afford to live in one. I sleep in my truck sometimes. I got friends living in tool sheds and tents while thousands of condos sit empty — or worse, full of tourists.
You hear the same story from plenty of us. Locals pushed out while out-of-state owners run mini-hotels in apartment buildings. All legal, they say. But it’s not right. They got tax breaks and zoning loopholes while our own people got nothing but eviction notices and broken promises.
⸻
The Entitlement Is Sickening
These short-term rental owners act like Maui owes them something. Like we should be grateful they hire a few workers and drop money at Foodland. They wave flags, talk about freedom, property rights, the American Dream.
But what about our dreams? What about the freedom to live on our own land?
They say they “support local” — but when the fires happened and they were asked to help, 90% said no. They care until they don’t get their way. The moment you threaten their profits, they cry foul. That’s not love for Maui. That’s greed.
⸻
These Are Businesses, Not Homes
These STVRs run like hotels:
• Year-round bookings
• Front desks
• Cleaning crews
• Big profits
• Tax write-offs
And while they cash in, I’m out here building homes I’ll never afford. My coworker sleeps in his car. My cousin’s family is crammed into a garage.
This system is broken.
⸻
It’s Time to Correct the Market
Some people are scared of what will happen if Bill 9 passes. Property values drop? Good. Maybe local people can finally buy. Condos lose income? They’ll adjust. Front desks go? So what.
The market will fix itself. Maui will move on. This bill just puts us back on track.
I’m tired of begging for change. I’m tired of watching tourists get oceanfront while I get priced out of Kahului. And I’m tired of outsiders acting like they know better.
⸻
Do the Right Thing — Pass Bill 9
Bill 9 is fair. It’s overdue. And it’s the only real step I’ve seen in years that actually puts us first.
Don’t back down. The island is watching.
Mahalo,
Tryson Kaiama
Maui Resident – Native Hawaiian
Construction Worker
Kathleen Gookin, Kihei
Aloha Chair and Council Members,
Within days of the Lahaina fires, my husband and I DONATED our condo to a mom and her two autistic sons. FEMA wasn't even here yet. One of the boys had a terrible accident in our shower requiring 50 stitches. We had the shower repaired and did not charge them. I know other people that also donated their condos. I oppose Bill 9 because I do not believe it will create affordable housing. In fact, I fear the unemployment it will create and there will be even more homeless people. You should use some of the 65% increase in my property taxes to build affordable housing. I also believe Bill 9 is unconstitutional at the state and federal level.
I oppose Bill 9 for many reasons, I have a legal 1 bdrm short term rental in Kihei that employs a property manager and a cleaner I pay taxs and it makes it affordable for tourists who don't make the huge dollars to come and see beautiful Kihei, instead of staying at the expensive resorts which most normal people cant afford.. Being a small one bedroom its not a property for families. Its one on the Minatoya list and should be more of a permanent short term rental. Between taxs and income for tourists and employing 2 residents it helps the economy on Maui. I respect and have many friends who have lived on Maui for decades or were born there and it is a tough situation but in my mid its clear. /cintinue to build homes only to be purchased by the residents of Maui and dont add anymore short term rentals.
My name is Lore Menin. I own a few short-term vacation rentals in apartment-zoned buildings here on Maui. I’m writing to say I support Bill 9, and I think it’s time we make this change.
I didn’t always feel this way. Like many owners, I bought my units to rent out short-term. It helped pay the bills and gave me some flexibility. But I’ve watched what’s happened to Maui these last few years—especially after the fires—and I can’t ignore it anymore.
There are too many families with no homes. Too many workers living in cars. Too many locals being pushed out.
⸻
I See the Bigger Picture Now
I know people are worried—about property values, maintenance fees, and what happens next. But the truth is, the market will adjust. People will sell. Some of us will convert to long-term. Condos will drop the front desks if they need to. We’ll move on.
This isn’t the end of the world. It’s the end of a loophole.
These vacation rentals have been operating like businesses, but they’re in buildings meant for residents. We make money, write off expenses, and get tax breaks. Meanwhile, the people we hire—cleaners, handymen, landscapers—can’t even afford a room to sleep in. That’s not right.
⸻
Most of the Owners Aren’t Even Here
Let’s be honest—most STVR owners don’t even live on Maui. They live on the mainland and just want their ROI. When the County offered fire victim housing plans, almost nobody signed up. We all had a chance to help, and 90% of owners said no.
It’s time to stop pretending this is about supporting locals. It’s about protecting profits.
⸻
I’m Ready to Sell or Convert
I’ve already started looking at long-term options. I’m ready to sell some units or rent them to local families. It won’t be as profitable, but it will feel a lot better. And I know I’m not the only one.
Please pass Bill 9. Some of us are ready. It’s time for the rest to follow.
I submit this testimony in strong support of Bill 9, which will remove short-term vacation rentals (STVRs) from apartment-zoned properties, including those previously grandfathered under the “Minatoya list.”
In response to the destruction in Lahaina and Kula, Governor Green declared a State of Emergency on Housing. Thousands of residents remain displaced and overcrowded in unsafe, non-conforming housing, while STVRs sit idle or continue operating as de facto hotels in apartment buildings.
Despite County and State efforts—including tax incentives and guaranteed above-market rent offers—over 90% of STVR owners refused to house local families, proving these units are not part of the housing solution.
That’s because over 90% of STVR owners are out-of-state investors who have no stake in the community beyond extracting returns. They rejected public offers that would have helped displaced residents because tourist profit margins were more attractive.
These units are commercial operations in residential zoning:
• They operate year-round at 50–80% occupancy
• Claim tax write-offs and depreciation as business expenses
• Compete with hotels while avoiding commercial regulation
• Often retain front desks, concierge services, and cleaning crews
• Are financed with cash or costly commercial-style loans (condotels)
STVR owners claim to “support local jobs,” but their housekeepers sleep in cars and their handymen can’t afford rent. That is not support—it’s exploitation.
Opponents of Bill 9 warn that property values might decline, maintenance fees might rise, or financing might become more complex. That’s not a crisis—it’s the cost of correcting a distorted, speculative market.
Maui’s market will correct—and that’s a good thing.
Once Bill 9 is approved, the County will move forward with:
• Targeted enforcement
• Policy updates aligned with zoning intent
• Support for condo AOAO transitions
Condo associations will have the opportunity to eliminate front desk check-ins, adjust bylaws, and return to being residential communities rather than pseudo-hotels.
These are manageable shifts, and the County is fully capable of supporting a lawful, phased transition.
Bill 9 Is a Moral and Legal Imperative, approach deliberations with that mindset.
This bill:
• Ends the misuse of residential zoning for commercial gain
• Reinforces the Governor’s emergency housing directive
• Prioritizes residents over absentee speculation
• Aligns land use with long-term community wellbeing
If STVR owners refused to help during a disaster, they should not be allowed to profit during recovery. This is a moment for the County to lead with courage.
Pass Bill 9. The time to restore housing to the people of Maui is now.
I oppose Bill 9. My husband and I have been full time Hawaii residents for 38 years. We have owned our condo at Kamaole Sands (two bedroom) for 39 years.
We have always used on site management for our condo. It has always been run like a hotel and it would not work for a long term rentals with only one parking spot and no off street parking. The maintenance fees are extremely high due to the upkeep of the hotel amenities offered. We even have the front desk hooked to our telephones in the units like a hotel would have. The rent that would have to be charged for an owner to even break even would be more than most of the people looking for long term housing could pay. All of the long term apartments/condos that were built just before or since l986 do not provide the pools, tennis, gyms, etc. and beautiful grounds that our hotel condo does. Kihei Villages as well as Keonakai Village were built for that purpose as well as Kihei Shores, Pacific Shores and many others. They all offer several parking spaces per unit. So many housekeepers, maintenance and managerial jobs will be lost as well as so many local businesses. The county will also be losing so much tax revenue that is greatly needed and hopefully you would not put an extra burden on the already over-taxed citizens.
Please, please do not pass Bill 9!!!
Maui does need more affordable housing for our local residents. However, this bill will actually exacerbate the problem by reducing employment, local businesses, and tax revenues, while providing few additional affordable units.
There are better solutions to our housing shortage. The most obvious and efficient is to require affordable housing be included as a provision for building more luxury housing, which seems to be quickly approved and constantly growing across Maui.
Let’s find a real solution instead! Our neighbors deserve so much better than this deeply flawed bill.
Tourism is the biggest driver of the economy in Maui. Changing the rules to force longer term rentals will devastate an economy that is already reeling from the fires and from all of the red tape slowing the rebuilding process.
Aloha, my name is Roy Martin and I am an owner of a condo in Kihei for over twelve years; paying taxes to Maui as a legal short term rental owner. I am strongly opposed to this bill because I do not think it will open up new housing to local residents that would be adequate or desirable to those seeking long term residence. At the present time there are numerous long term rental options that are empty because they are not suitable or too far from West Maui. If this bill is passed, there will be more condos that will not be rented, it will negatively impact the local economy and it will not achieve the stated goal of housing Maui residents. Thank you for your time and consideration.
It saddens me that Maui has created such a hostile environment in what truly used to seem like paradise. While I know the history of Hawaii is complex I also know that it is now 2025. While we can honor the past, we must live in the present.
Those in favor of this bill seem blame STRs for a housing shortage - it is unfortunate that these rental condo owners are being villainized when again, many complex layers have led to housing challenges a key one is the reduction in new home construction in the last 20 years. It seems that today many affordable condos are on the market, yet I don't see them being purchased in timely fashion or even rented. Current rental inventory indicates that currently, there are 106 homes for rent in Maui for under $3,000/month - this seems quite affordable. Why isn't the local population taking advantage of these opportunities?
The economy is always a key concern - I know that STRs employ many locals and support a myriad of businesses. Two of the entities that help me care for my home oppose this bill but are too afraid to speak out because of "bullying" behavior from those that support it.
Finally, I am not a bad person because I do not reside in Maui all year long. Just like many areas of the USA people own homes/rentals - this is not a unique trend or situation. Maui, Hawaii is a part of the USA not some isolated country. It's disheartening that again, we are being looked at as "less than" when we love this place as well. Maui has been a second home to us for over 30 years - it has always been welcoming and kind until COVID, that's when we felt the shift. Since then it seems that someone grabbed hold of the steering wheel and took things off course. Of course, the fires only made things worse.
It's unfortunate that an entity has done so much damage to relationships and ultimately divided a community. It's unfortunate that despite repeated studies Maui somehow thinks that the economy won't suffer with a ban on STRs. STR owners are already paying a huge price in increased taxes and are happy to do so for the betterment of the community.
I know the former AG of Hawaii spoke about how this bill is unconstitutional. It seems strange to me that you would continue to pursue it from that standpoint. It's even more perplexing that you would pursue it knowing how this issue has brought so much negativity to the surface. It is my hope that you, as leaders, will find a place that allows for respect and harmony. Decreasing the value of my property and others will only ensure that this conversation takes place for many, many years and in the end, I don't see how Maui isn't left with a large bill and no real solution.
I oppose bill 9. I feel that tax dollars should go to other housing options such a modular homes like Continest & Boxbl.
If the local or state government provides a modular home or even has a financing program for home owners that have space on their property to put a modular home on, not only does it give one person a place to stay but it would generate income for a local family as well
Not to mention, let’s say a local family was reliant on the income of a STR, if they’re no longer allowed to rent short term and it forces them to sell, more than likely an investor with an abundant amount of capital will buy the property and hold on to it and it will then further the gap from allowing anyone else to buy it.
I strongly oppose Bill 9. First of all, it is illegal. The 5th Amendment to the US constitution prohibits "Takings" which is exactly what this is. The Hawaiian Constitution Article 1, section 20 also prohibits "takings" but also "damages" to private property. The legal principle of estoppel also prohibits, in this case, Maui County, from taking away a previous lawful use that has been confirmed multiple times in Maui County ordinances and rulings. Second of all, if the 7000 Maui County property holders claim only $200,000 in damages, Maui County will have to pay $1.4 BILLION dollars in damages. If that number doesn't stop you in your tracks, it should. I suspect Maui County does not have that kind of money to pay out to condo owners. How much housing could Maui County build for $1.4 BILLION dollars.
I strongly suggest you take the emotion out of this equation and look only at the law. Both Kauai and Honolulu have tried what Maui County is proposing and the courts ruled against them. These are precedents that have already set up Bill 9 for failure. If the Council's attorneys are telling you that they have a way to work around these rulings, then I would reach out to new counsel for a second opinion.
Everyone deserves decent housing but forcing Bill 9 into the courts for who only knows how many years, is just kicking the can down the road. You need a better plan to provide affordable housing. You need to start building.
Regards, Ken Carpenter
I am a Maui resident and I oppose Bill 9
My condo was purchased in 2009 as my residence and was designated as Hotel/Condo. This was used as a STVR for times I visited family on the mainland, rented for less than 45 days a year. However, because I live and vote in Maui County, I won’t be turning it into a long term rental. I oppose Bill 9 because it was ill conceived, housing has been an issue before the Wildfire destroyed so many homes and this is not the answer. Maui County needs a better plan for subsidizing housing.
Use the property and TAT taxes to cover workforce housing costs. Build faster and better homes reserved for locals with tourism dollars. Thank you for considering this Maui resident’s testimony.
I strongly oppose Bill 9. I live and I have owned a rental on Maui since 1993, bought as part of my retirement portfolio. If Bill 9 is passed the income I rely on for my daily bread will vanish as will a great deal of revenue from tourism that go into the treasury. So good luck maintaining the programs that support the poorest in Maui and good luck with getting reelected, because you will have lost my vote and according to those I have spoken to a large number of others who live on Mau.
Subject: Strong Opposition to STR Phase-Out – A Devastating Path for Maui
Aloha Chair, Vice Chair, and Committee Members,
My name is Renee Lach, and my sister and I are proud owners of a short-term rental (STR) property in Maui County. A home we purchased from our parents, who lovingly maintained it for nearly 20 years. I’m writing to express my deep concern and strong opposition to the proposed
legislation that would phase out over 7,000 vacation rentals.
This proposal is not just about property, it’s about people. My family has always approached ownership in Maui with deep respect for the island and its community. There is truly no place on earth more beautiful, and we feel privileged to be stewards of a home here. We’ve hired a local
property manager who has been with us for over 15 years, along with her team of housekeepers, landscapers, and maintenance professionals, many of whom have become like family. In our welcome guide, we share personal recommendations that highlight local gems like
Duke’s, Bad Ass Coffee, and various island tours and activities. Our guests often tell us that these local touches helped them feel a deeper, more personal connection to Maui. One they simply wouldn’t have found in a hotel!
Many of our guests return year after year, including one tenant who has visited every January for 20 consecutive years, two sisters who began coming with their husbands, now return as widows to honor old memories and create new ones. This is the kind of connection that builds
lifelong loyalty to Maui and supports countless small businesses.
But here’s the truth: the majority of our guests tell us they would not come to Maui at all if shortterm rentals weren’t available. Hotels and timeshares don’t offer the space, flexibility, or affordability that families and long-term visitors need. STRs are not a threat to tourism, they are
part of its evolution. They support the very foundation of the visitor economy and contribute deeply to the character of the community.
The economic consequences of this legislation are staggering. According to research by the Travel Technology Association and Kloninger & Sims: If only Mayor Minatoya’s List of STRs are phased out, Maui County would lose:
• $53.3 to $91.8 million in RPT, TAT, and GET tax revenue
• $1.3 billion in economic output
• 7,800 local jobs
If all STRs are removed, the losses jump to:
• $128.3 to $280.9 million in tax revenue
• $2.2 billion in economic output
• 23,000 local jobs
These aren’t just numbers, they represent livelihoods, small businesses, and essential services. STR guests spent $2.2 billion in 2023 in Maui County alone. Across Hawai‘i, that figure reached $11.3 billion and supported 66,000 jobs. What is the County’s plan to replace this revenue and protect the local economy and jobs?
Owning in Maui is not without its challenges. We’ve weathered steep increases in insurance following the fires (nearly 40%), rising maintenance costs, and special assessments ($30,000 in 2024), all to preserve our property and keep it safe, welcoming, and functional. STR income
helps make this possible while keeping local service providers employed. This legislation feels rushed and punitive. Instead of shutting down an industry that has demonstrated both economic and community value, I urge the Council to collaborate with responsible owners to find balanced, enforceable solutions. We are not your adversaries, we want to be part of the answer.
Mahalo for your time and consideration. I respectfully ask you to vote against this legislation and work toward a future that honors the needs of residents, visitors, and Maui’s economy alike.
Mahalo,
Renee Lach & Denise Walton
The local government could take head count on how many home owners would want to have a modular home on their property. All payment goes back to the county until it’s paid off and then property owner will take ownership of modular home, and then the county will still benefit from the taxes from rent on the modular home
Here’s a rewritten version of the testimony from the voice of a 32-year-old Native Hawaiian construction worker, written in plain, direct language. This version keeps the same powerful message but grounds it in lived experience, local identity, and frustration with entitlement and displacement.
⸻
🧾 Testimony from a Local Resident in Support of Bill 9
To: Maui County Council – Housing and Land Use Committee
From: Kainoa (Resident, 32, Native Hawaiian, Construction Worker)
Subject: Strong Support for Bill 9
Date: [Insert Date]
⸻
Aloha Councilmembers,
I work construction. My family is Hawaiian. We’ve been here for generations.
I’m writing to say I’m in strong support of Bill 9. It’s time.
⸻
We’ve Had Enough
I work hard. I help build homes here. But I can’t even afford to live in one. I sleep in my truck sometimes. I got friends living in tool sheds and tents while thousands of condos sit empty — or worse, full of tourists.
You hear the same story from plenty of us. Locals pushed out while out-of-state owners run mini-hotels in apartment buildings. All legal, they say. But it’s not right. They got tax breaks and zoning loopholes while our own people got nothing but eviction notices and broken promises.
⸻
The Entitlement Is Sickening
These short-term rental owners act like Maui owes them something. Like we should be grateful they hire a few workers and drop money at Foodland. They wave flags, talk about freedom, property rights, the American Dream.
But what about our dreams? What about the freedom to live on our own land?
They say they “support local” — but when the fires happened and they were asked to help, 90% said no. They care until they don’t get their way. The moment you threaten their profits, they cry foul. That’s not love for Maui. That’s greed.
⸻
These Are Businesses, Not Homes
These STVRs run like hotels:
• Year-round bookings
• Front desks
• Cleaning crews
• Big profits
• Tax write-offs
And while they cash in, I’m out here building homes I’ll never afford. My coworker sleeps in his car. My cousin’s family is crammed into a garage.
This system is broken.
⸻
It’s Time to Correct the Market
Some people are scared of what will happen if Bill 9 passes. Property values drop? Good. Maybe local people can finally buy. Condos lose income? They’ll adjust. Front desks go? So what.
The market will fix itself. Maui will move on. This bill just puts us back on track.
I’m tired of begging for change. I’m tired of watching tourists get oceanfront while I get priced out of Kahului. And I’m tired of outsiders acting like they know better.
⸻
Do the Right Thing — Pass Bill 9
Bill 9 is fair. It’s overdue. And it’s the only real step I’ve seen in years that actually puts us first.
Don’t back down. The island is watching.
Mahalo,
Tryson Kaiama
Maui Resident – Native Hawaiian
Construction Worker
I oppose bill 9.
Kathleen Gookin, Kihei
Aloha Chair and Council Members,
Within days of the Lahaina fires, my husband and I DONATED our condo to a mom and her two autistic sons. FEMA wasn't even here yet. One of the boys had a terrible accident in our shower requiring 50 stitches. We had the shower repaired and did not charge them. I know other people that also donated their condos. I oppose Bill 9 because I do not believe it will create affordable housing. In fact, I fear the unemployment it will create and there will be even more homeless people. You should use some of the 65% increase in my property taxes to build affordable housing. I also believe Bill 9 is unconstitutional at the state and federal level.
I oppose Bill 9 for many reasons, I have a legal 1 bdrm short term rental in Kihei that employs a property manager and a cleaner I pay taxs and it makes it affordable for tourists who don't make the huge dollars to come and see beautiful Kihei, instead of staying at the expensive resorts which most normal people cant afford.. Being a small one bedroom its not a property for families. Its one on the Minatoya list and should be more of a permanent short term rental. Between taxs and income for tourists and employing 2 residents it helps the economy on Maui. I respect and have many friends who have lived on Maui for decades or were born there and it is a tough situation but in my mid its clear. /cintinue to build homes only to be purchased by the residents of Maui and dont add anymore short term rentals.
Aloha Chair and Councilmembers
My name is Lore Menin. I own a few short-term vacation rentals in apartment-zoned buildings here on Maui. I’m writing to say I support Bill 9, and I think it’s time we make this change.
I didn’t always feel this way. Like many owners, I bought my units to rent out short-term. It helped pay the bills and gave me some flexibility. But I’ve watched what’s happened to Maui these last few years—especially after the fires—and I can’t ignore it anymore.
There are too many families with no homes. Too many workers living in cars. Too many locals being pushed out.
⸻
I See the Bigger Picture Now
I know people are worried—about property values, maintenance fees, and what happens next. But the truth is, the market will adjust. People will sell. Some of us will convert to long-term. Condos will drop the front desks if they need to. We’ll move on.
This isn’t the end of the world. It’s the end of a loophole.
These vacation rentals have been operating like businesses, but they’re in buildings meant for residents. We make money, write off expenses, and get tax breaks. Meanwhile, the people we hire—cleaners, handymen, landscapers—can’t even afford a room to sleep in. That’s not right.
⸻
Most of the Owners Aren’t Even Here
Let’s be honest—most STVR owners don’t even live on Maui. They live on the mainland and just want their ROI. When the County offered fire victim housing plans, almost nobody signed up. We all had a chance to help, and 90% of owners said no.
It’s time to stop pretending this is about supporting locals. It’s about protecting profits.
⸻
I’m Ready to Sell or Convert
I’ve already started looking at long-term options. I’m ready to sell some units or rent them to local families. It won’t be as profitable, but it will feel a lot better. And I know I’m not the only one.
Please pass Bill 9. Some of us are ready. It’s time for the rest to follow.
Mahalo,
Lore Menin
STVR Owner – Maui
Kihei Resident
Aloha Chair and Councilmembers,
I submit this testimony in strong support of Bill 9, which will remove short-term vacation rentals (STVRs) from apartment-zoned properties, including those previously grandfathered under the “Minatoya list.”
In response to the destruction in Lahaina and Kula, Governor Green declared a State of Emergency on Housing. Thousands of residents remain displaced and overcrowded in unsafe, non-conforming housing, while STVRs sit idle or continue operating as de facto hotels in apartment buildings.
Despite County and State efforts—including tax incentives and guaranteed above-market rent offers—over 90% of STVR owners refused to house local families, proving these units are not part of the housing solution.
That’s because over 90% of STVR owners are out-of-state investors who have no stake in the community beyond extracting returns. They rejected public offers that would have helped displaced residents because tourist profit margins were more attractive.
These units are commercial operations in residential zoning:
• They operate year-round at 50–80% occupancy
• Claim tax write-offs and depreciation as business expenses
• Compete with hotels while avoiding commercial regulation
• Often retain front desks, concierge services, and cleaning crews
• Are financed with cash or costly commercial-style loans (condotels)
STVR owners claim to “support local jobs,” but their housekeepers sleep in cars and their handymen can’t afford rent. That is not support—it’s exploitation.
Opponents of Bill 9 warn that property values might decline, maintenance fees might rise, or financing might become more complex. That’s not a crisis—it’s the cost of correcting a distorted, speculative market.
Maui’s market will correct—and that’s a good thing.
Once Bill 9 is approved, the County will move forward with:
• Targeted enforcement
• Policy updates aligned with zoning intent
• Support for condo AOAO transitions
Condo associations will have the opportunity to eliminate front desk check-ins, adjust bylaws, and return to being residential communities rather than pseudo-hotels.
These are manageable shifts, and the County is fully capable of supporting a lawful, phased transition.
Bill 9 Is a Moral and Legal Imperative, approach deliberations with that mindset.
This bill:
• Ends the misuse of residential zoning for commercial gain
• Reinforces the Governor’s emergency housing directive
• Prioritizes residents over absentee speculation
• Aligns land use with long-term community wellbeing
If STVR owners refused to help during a disaster, they should not be allowed to profit during recovery. This is a moment for the County to lead with courage.
Pass Bill 9. The time to restore housing to the people of Maui is now.
Respectfully,
Edward Codelia
I oppose Bill 9. My husband and I have been full time Hawaii residents for 38 years. We have owned our condo at Kamaole Sands (two bedroom) for 39 years.
We have always used on site management for our condo. It has always been run like a hotel and it would not work for a long term rentals with only one parking spot and no off street parking. The maintenance fees are extremely high due to the upkeep of the hotel amenities offered. We even have the front desk hooked to our telephones in the units like a hotel would have. The rent that would have to be charged for an owner to even break even would be more than most of the people looking for long term housing could pay. All of the long term apartments/condos that were built just before or since l986 do not provide the pools, tennis, gyms, etc. and beautiful grounds that our hotel condo does. Kihei Villages as well as Keonakai Village were built for that purpose as well as Kihei Shores, Pacific Shores and many others. They all offer several parking spaces per unit. So many housekeepers, maintenance and managerial jobs will be lost as well as so many local businesses. The county will also be losing so much tax revenue that is greatly needed and hopefully you would not put an extra burden on the already over-taxed citizens.
Please, please do not pass Bill 9!!!
I oppose this bill.
Maui does need more affordable housing for our local residents. However, this bill will actually exacerbate the problem by reducing employment, local businesses, and tax revenues, while providing few additional affordable units.
There are better solutions to our housing shortage. The most obvious and efficient is to require affordable housing be included as a provision for building more luxury housing, which seems to be quickly approved and constantly growing across Maui.
Let’s find a real solution instead! Our neighbors deserve so much better than this deeply flawed bill.
Tourism is the biggest driver of the economy in Maui. Changing the rules to force longer term rentals will devastate an economy that is already reeling from the fires and from all of the red tape slowing the rebuilding process.
Strongly oppose Bill 9.
Aloha, my name is Roy Martin and I am an owner of a condo in Kihei for over twelve years; paying taxes to Maui as a legal short term rental owner. I am strongly opposed to this bill because I do not think it will open up new housing to local residents that would be adequate or desirable to those seeking long term residence. At the present time there are numerous long term rental options that are empty because they are not suitable or too far from West Maui. If this bill is passed, there will be more condos that will not be rented, it will negatively impact the local economy and it will not achieve the stated goal of housing Maui residents. Thank you for your time and consideration.
It saddens me that Maui has created such a hostile environment in what truly used to seem like paradise. While I know the history of Hawaii is complex I also know that it is now 2025. While we can honor the past, we must live in the present.
Those in favor of this bill seem blame STRs for a housing shortage - it is unfortunate that these rental condo owners are being villainized when again, many complex layers have led to housing challenges a key one is the reduction in new home construction in the last 20 years. It seems that today many affordable condos are on the market, yet I don't see them being purchased in timely fashion or even rented. Current rental inventory indicates that currently, there are 106 homes for rent in Maui for under $3,000/month - this seems quite affordable. Why isn't the local population taking advantage of these opportunities?
The economy is always a key concern - I know that STRs employ many locals and support a myriad of businesses. Two of the entities that help me care for my home oppose this bill but are too afraid to speak out because of "bullying" behavior from those that support it.
Finally, I am not a bad person because I do not reside in Maui all year long. Just like many areas of the USA people own homes/rentals - this is not a unique trend or situation. Maui, Hawaii is a part of the USA not some isolated country. It's disheartening that again, we are being looked at as "less than" when we love this place as well. Maui has been a second home to us for over 30 years - it has always been welcoming and kind until COVID, that's when we felt the shift. Since then it seems that someone grabbed hold of the steering wheel and took things off course. Of course, the fires only made things worse.
It's unfortunate that an entity has done so much damage to relationships and ultimately divided a community. It's unfortunate that despite repeated studies Maui somehow thinks that the economy won't suffer with a ban on STRs. STR owners are already paying a huge price in increased taxes and are happy to do so for the betterment of the community.
I know the former AG of Hawaii spoke about how this bill is unconstitutional. It seems strange to me that you would continue to pursue it from that standpoint. It's even more perplexing that you would pursue it knowing how this issue has brought so much negativity to the surface. It is my hope that you, as leaders, will find a place that allows for respect and harmony. Decreasing the value of my property and others will only ensure that this conversation takes place for many, many years and in the end, I don't see how Maui isn't left with a large bill and no real solution.
I firmly oppose Bill 9.
I oppose Bill 9
I oppose bill 9. I feel that tax dollars should go to other housing options such a modular homes like Continest & Boxbl.
If the local or state government provides a modular home or even has a financing program for home owners that have space on their property to put a modular home on, not only does it give one person a place to stay but it would generate income for a local family as well
Not to mention, let’s say a local family was reliant on the income of a STR, if they’re no longer allowed to rent short term and it forces them to sell, more than likely an investor with an abundant amount of capital will buy the property and hold on to it and it will then further the gap from allowing anyone else to buy it.